Related Articles

9 Comments

  1. 1

    electric2010

    Yes, please do post….

  2. 2

    birsbanepoolboy94

    Yes please would love to see some of that 😉

  3. 3

    DeepKisser

    They look great. Poolside fun is always good.

  4. 4

    spear

    Twinks don’t do anything for me. Men, as in actual men, would look a lot more interesting

  5. 5

    samspeedo

    Yeah . . . they are cute . . . not as cute as the ‘Brad Pitt’ lookalike the other day. [He was awesome btw . . . !]

    Love to see more of him and these guys in future . . . with and without speedos!

  6. 6

    Randy

    The definition of “Speedo” seems to be broadening all the time. These fashion fag “speedos” don’t do anything for me. Nor does anything else that gets away from the classic, 3-inch side, athletic-cut Speedo in solid colors. The basic Aussiebum suits excepted.

  7. 7

    Spear

    Hey Randy, using the word “fag” seems to define where you’re coming from. Who is the fag here anyhow. And your idea of a classic speedo is way out of date. Maybe time to get with it. It’s the year 2014 not 1980.

  8. 8

    samspeedo

    Yeah . . . I think 3-inch sides are FAR too wide! A great speedo is a narrow sided one . . . perhaps 1 or 1.5 inches AT MOST!

    For comfort in wear as well as a good appearance/profile, a narrow side combined with a high cut is best (IMHO) . . .

    I know there’ll be some disagreement amongst others – that’s just my personal preference (as well as what I buy) in a speedo!

  9. 9

    Dave Evans

    Sam,

    The feedback I’ve been getting (with the next run of my DE Swimwear in mind) is that you guys like a smaller side which I thought was interesting.

    Thanks a bunch for all your comments guys – I love it!!!

    Dave

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *